Corporate Services, Inc.
208 Kishwaukee St. · Rockford, IL 61104
(p) (815) 962-8367 · (f) (815) 962-0940

EEOC Clarifies Position on High School Diploma Requirement


Late last year, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) indicated that companies requiring employees to have a high school diploma could be in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The resulting uproar has resulted in the agency issuing further guidance on the subject.

The controversy was started by an "informal discussion" letter from EEOC attorney Aaron Konopasky last December (here). Acknowledging that Konopasky's missive sparked "significant commentary and conjecture" about exactly where the agency stood on the issue, the EEOC has posted a series of questions and answers on its website.

Bottom line: Employers still have the option of requiring employees to be high school graduates. "However, the employer may have to allow someone who says that a disability has prevented him from obtaining a high school diploma to demonstrate qualification for the job in some other way," the agency says. The guidance emphasizes the fact that the ADA "only protects someone whose disability makes it impossible for him or her to get a diploma. It would not protect someone who simply decided not to get a high school diploma."

Want to know more? Read the full article by Tim Gould at HR Morning

More News from Corporate Services, Inc.

Eleven Remarkable Overtime Rule Tips From a DOL Insider

There is more to the Fair Labor Standards Act's (FLSA) overtime exemption rule changes (and salary threshold) than meets the eye. A former administrator for the Department of Labor (DOL) recently opened a lot of employers' eyes with what she had to say about the new rule.more

Human Resources Directors Can Be Sued for FMLA Violations Too

In March, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (New York, et al) ruled that a company's Director of Human Resources may have wielded enough authority on matters related to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) administration to bind the company. Thus, she may have exposed herself to liability under the FMLA.more