Health Reform Expert: What Human Resources Needs to Know About GOP Repeal Bill Passing the House
Posted: May 8, 2017
Virtually every major news outlet is covering the passage of the American Health Care Act (AHCA) by the U.S. House of Representatives. But amidst all the coverage, it is tough to find an answer to a question that is near and dear to human resources: What does this GOP victory mean for employers?
The AHCA bill, which passed in the House with 217 votes, is extremely close to the original version of the legislation that was introduced in March but pulled just before a vote could take place due to lack of support.
While the so-called "repeal-and-replace" bill would kill many of the ACA's taxes (except the Cadillac Tax), much of the popular health-related provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would remain intact.
Pre-existing conditions, essential benefits
However, the new bill does allow states to waive certain key requirements under the ACA. One of the major amendments centers on pre-existing conditions.
Under the ACA, health plans cannot base premium rates on health status factors, or pre-existing conditions; premiums had to be based on coverage tier, community rating, age (as long as the rates do not vary by more than 3 to 1) and tobacco use. In other words, plans cannot charge participants with pre-existing conditions more than "healthy" individuals are charged.
Under the AHCA, individual states can apply for waivers to be exempt from this ACA provision and base premiums on health status factors.
Bottom line: Under this version of the AHCA, insurers would still be required to cover individuals with pre-existing conditions — but they would be allowed to charge more for that coverage.
To compensate for the individuals with prior health conditions who may not be able to afford insurance, applying states would have to establish high-risk pools that are federally funded. Critics argue these pools will not be able to offer nearly as much coverage for individuals as the ACA did.
Under the AHCA, states could also apply for a waiver to receive an exemption — dubbed the "MacArthur amendment" — to the ACA requirement on essential health benefits and create their own definition of these benefits.
Implications for human resources
So what does all this mean for human resources professionals? HR Morning spoke to healthcare reform implementation and employee benefits attorney Garrett Fenton of Miller & Chevalier and asked him what is next for the AHCA as well as what employers should do in response. Here is a sample:
HR Morning: What is next for the AHCA?
Garrett Fenton: The Senate, which largely has stayed out of the ACA repeal and replacement process until now, will begin its process to develop, amend, and ultimately vote on a bill [...] many Republican Senators have publicly voiced concerns, and even opposition, to the version of the AHCA that passed the House.
One major bone of contention — even within the GOP — was that the House passed the bill without waiting for a forthcoming updated report from the Congressional Budget Office. That report will take into account the latest amendments to the AHCA, and provide estimates of the legislation's cost to the federal government and impact on the number of uninsured individuals.
[A]ssuming the Senate does not simply rubber stamp the House bill, but rather passes its own ACA repeal and replacement legislation, either the Senate's bill will need to go back to the House for another vote, or the House and Senate will "conference," reconcile the differences between their respective bills, and produce a compromise piece of legislation that both chambers will then vote on.
Ultimately the same bill will need to pass both the House and Senate before going to the President for his signature. In light of the House's struggles to advance the AHCA, and the razor-thin margin by which it ultimately passed, it appears that we are still in for a long road ahead.
HR Morning: What should employers be doing now?
Garrett Fenton: At this point, employers would be well-advised to stay the course on ACA compliance. The House's passage of the AHCA is merely the first step in the legislative process, with the bill likely to undergo significant changes and an uncertain future in the Senate. The last few months have taught us nothing if not the impossibility of predicting precisely how and when the Republicans' ACA repeal and replacement effort ultimately will unfold. To be sure, the AHCA would have a potentially significant impact on employer-sponsored coverage.
However, any employer efforts to implement large-scale changes in reliance on the AHCA certainly would be premature at this stage. The ACA remains the law of the land for the time being, and there is still a long way to go toward even a partial repeal and replacement. Employers certainly should stay on top of the legislative developments, and in the meantime, be on the lookout for possible changes to the current guidance at the regulatory level.
HR Morning: Specifically, how should employers proceed with their ACA compliance obligations in light of the House passage of the AHCA?
Garrett Fenton: Again, employers should stay the course for the time being, and not assume that the AHCA's provisions impacting employer-sponsored plans ultimately will be enacted. However, a number of ACA-related changes are likely to be made at the regulatory and "sub-regulatory" level — regardless of the legislative repeal and replacement efforts — thereby underscoring the importance of staying on top of the ever-changing guidance and landscape under the Trump administration.
Fenton also touched on how the "MacArthur amendment" and the direct impact it could have on employers by stating it:
could impact large group and self-funded employer plans, which separately are prohibited from imposing annual and lifetime dollar limits on those same essential health benefits. So in theory, for example, a large group or self-funded employer plan might be able to use a "waiver" state's definition of essential health benefits — which could be significantly more limited than the current federal definition, and exclude items like maternity, mental health, or substance abuse coverage — for purposes of the annual and lifetime limit rules. Employers thus effectively could be permitted to begin imposing dollar caps on certain benefits that currently would be prohibited under the ACA.
Posted In: Congressional Activity; Affordable Care Act (ACA)
Want to know more? Read the full article by Jared Bilski at HR Morning